DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2003 Toyota Alphard Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Alphard

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
166ModelAlphard
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2364 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
305 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4845 mm
1815 mmWidth1830 mm
1416 mmHeight1935 mm
1490 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2003 Toyota Alphard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…