DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Chariot vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Chariot

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlfa Romeo
ChariotModel166
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2350 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
225 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4600 mmLength4720 mm
1775 mmWidth1815 mm
1650 mmHeight1416 mm
1900 KgWeight1490 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Chariot and 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Chariot leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…