DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Chevrolet Astro vs 1994 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeLand Rover
AstroModelRange Rover
1995Model year1994
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
178 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4293 ccEngine displacement4273 cc
163 HPPower202 HP
319 NmTorque149 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption21,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,7 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption15,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/70 R15 TTyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4761 mmLength4449 mm
1969 mmWidth1818 mm
1947 mmHeight1790 mm
1844 KgWeight2075 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Chevrolet Astro and 1994 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…