DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1995 Chevrolet Astro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChevrolet
Range RoverModelAstro
1994Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed178 km/h
4273 ccEngine displacement4293 cc
202 HPPower163 HP
149 NmTorque319 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank102 lt
21,6 ltUrban consumption—
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,1 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size205/70 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength4761 mm
1818 mmWidth1969 mm
1790 mmHeight1947 mm
2075 KgWeight1844 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1995 Chevrolet Astro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…