DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Astra vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
AstraModel323
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
188 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
111 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4110 mmLength4200 mm
1709 mmWidth1705 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
1100 KgWeight1175 Kg
2614 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Astra and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…