DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Chevrolet Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
323ModelAstra
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
178 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower111 HP
220 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4110 mm
1705 mmWidth1709 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1175 KgWeight1100 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2614 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Chevrolet Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…