DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 1999 Toyota MR 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
166ModelMR 2
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
237 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
205 HPPower208 HP
280 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank54 lt
17,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/55R16WTyre size195/55 R15; 225/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4170 mm
1815 mmWidth1695 mm
1416 mmHeight1235 mm
1495 KgWeight1260 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 and 1999 Toyota MR 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…