DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota MR 2 vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAlfa Romeo
MR 2Model166
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,1 s
0 km/hTop speed237 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
208 HPPower205 HP
275 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption17,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15; 225/50 R15Tyre size215/55R16W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4170 mmLength4720 mm
1695 mmWidth1815 mm
1235 mmHeight1416 mm
1260 KgWeight1495 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota MR 2 and 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…