DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Caterham Seven vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham Seven

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeVolvo
SevenModelS40
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,1 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
225 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
193 HPPower200 HP
203 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3380 mmLength4516 mm
1580 mmWidth1716 mm
1120 mmHeight1422 mm
—Weight1310 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Caterham Seven and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham Seven leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…