DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo S40 vs 2000 Caterham Seven Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham Seven

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCaterham
S40ModelSeven
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h4,1 s
235 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
200 HPPower193 HP
300 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank90 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption14 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4516 mmLength3380 mm
1716 mmWidth1580 mm
1422 mmHeight1120 mm
1310 KgWeight—
2562 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo S40 and 2000 Caterham Seven approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham Seven leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…