DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Caterham CSR vs 2013 Cadillac ATS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeCadillac
CSRModelATS
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
200 HPPower205 HP
221 NmTorque259 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4643 mm
1685 mmWidth1805 mm
1140 mmHeight1421 mm
565 KgWeight1505 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Caterham CSR and 2013 Cadillac ATS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…