DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Cadillac ATS vs 2013 Caterham CSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeCaterham
ATSModelCSR
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h3,7 s
0 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
205 HPPower200 HP
259 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4643 mmLength3300 mm
1805 mmWidth1685 mm
1421 mmHeight1140 mm
1505 KgWeight565 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Cadillac ATS and 2013 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…