DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Caterham CSR vs 2012 Volvo V70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeVolvo
CSRModelV70
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
225 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
200 HPPower205 HP
221 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4823 mm
1685 mmWidth—
1140 mmHeight1547 mm
565 KgWeight1806 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2816 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Caterham CSR and 2012 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…