DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Mondeo vs 2012 Caterham CSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCaterham
MondeoModelCSR
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h3,7 s
230 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
420 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4784 mmLength3300 mm
1886 mmWidth1685 mm
1500 mmHeight1140 mm
1599 KgWeight565 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Mondeo and 2012 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…