DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Caterham CSR vs 2012 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeCitroen
CSRModelC5
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
225 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
200 HPPower204 HP
221 NmTorque440 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank71 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size225/45 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4779 mm
1685 mmWidth1860 mm
1140 mmHeight1451-1458 mm
565 KgWeight1731 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Caterham CSR and 2012 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…