DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Caterham CSR vs 2009 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Caterham CSRSpecificationBMW Z4
CaterhamMakeBMW
CSRModelZ4
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Caterham CSRSpecificationBMW Z4
3,7 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
225 km/hTop speed242 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower204 HP
221 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Caterham CSRSpecificationBMW Z4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Caterham CSRSpecificationBMW Z4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size225/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Caterham CSRSpecificationBMW Z4
3300 mmLength4239 mm
1685 mmWidth1790 mm
1140 mmHeight1291 mm
565 KgWeight1480 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2496 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Caterham CSR and 2009 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…