DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 BMW Z4 vs 2009 Caterham CSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationCaterham CSR
BMWMakeCaterham
Z4ModelCSR
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationCaterham CSR
6,6 s0–100 km/h3,7 s
242 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
204 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque221 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationCaterham CSR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationCaterham CSR
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationCaterham CSR
4239 mmLength3300 mm
1790 mmWidth1685 mm
1291 mmHeight1140 mm
1480 KgWeight565 Kg
2496 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 BMW Z4 and 2009 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…