DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Caterham 21 vs 1996 Daihatsu Pyzar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeDaihatsu
21ModelPyzar
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
150 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank40 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
205/45 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4050 mm
1580 mmWidth1640 mm
1150 mmHeight1620 mm
650 KgWeight1080 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Caterham 21 and 1996 Daihatsu Pyzar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…