DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Citroen Saxo vs 1996 Caterham 21 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCaterham
SaxoModel21
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
205 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
118 HPPower117 HP
145 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/55 R14Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3718 mmLength3800 mm
1595 mmWidth1580 mm
1368 mmHeight1150 mm
935 KgWeight650 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Citroen Saxo and 1996 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…