DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Cadillac DE Ville vs 2000 Lincoln Continental Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Continental

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLincoln
DE VilleModelContinental
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
279 HPPower279 HP
407 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5258 mmLength5260 mm
1890 mmWidth1870 mm
1440 mmHeight1420 mm
1840 KgWeight1745 Kg
2929 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Cadillac DE Ville and 2000 Lincoln Continental approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Continental leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…