DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Cadillac CTS vs 2004 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A3
CadillacMakeAudi
CTSModelA3
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A3
7,0 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
233 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
258 HPPower250 HP
346 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A3
4828 mmLength4203 mm
1793 mmWidth1765 mm
1440 mmHeight1421 mm
1722 KgWeight1495 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Cadillac CTS and 2004 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…