2004 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 3.2i V6 24V (250 Hp) 2004Overall Score84.5/100
2004 Audi A3 vs 2005 Cadillac CTS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 3.6i V6 24V (258 Hp) 2005Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Audi A3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A3SpecificationCadillac CTS
AudiMakeCadillac
A3ModelCTS
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Audi A3SpecificationCadillac CTS
6,5 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
250 km/hTop speed233 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
250 HPPower258 HP
320 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A3SpecificationCadillac CTS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A3SpecificationCadillac CTS
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A3SpecificationCadillac CTS
4203 mmLength4828 mm
1765 mmWidth1793 mm
1421 mmHeight1440 mm
1495 KgWeight1722 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Audi A3 and 2005 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…