DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeToyota
CTSModelHighlander
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
238 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement3311 cc
223 HPPower218 HP
296 NmTorque301 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4685 mm
1793 mmWidth1825 mm
1440 mmHeight1735 mm
1628 KgWeight1680 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…