DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Mark II vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCadillac
Mark IIModelCTS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
210 km/hTop speed238 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
220 HPPower223 HP
296 NmTorque296 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
15 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4828 mm
1760 mmWidth1793 mm
1460 mmHeight1440 mm
1550 KgWeight1628 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Mark II and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…