DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Chrysler Crossfire Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Crossfire

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeChrysler
CTSModelCrossfire
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
238 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
223 HPPower215 HP
296 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size225/40 R18; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4058 mm
1793 mmWidth1766 mm
1440 mmHeight1296 mm
1628 KgWeight1377 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Chrysler Crossfire approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Crossfire leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…