DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Cadillac CTS vs 2010 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeNissan
CTSModelCima
2014Model year2010
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2994 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
273 HPPower280 HP
302 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears5
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4878 mmLength4970 mm
1842 mmWidth1820 mm
1473 mmHeight1450 mm
1821 KgWeight1670 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Cadillac CTS and 2010 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…