DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Cima vs 2014 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCadillac
CimaModelCTS
2010Model year2014
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2994 cc
280 HPPower273 HP
387 NmTorque302 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6 Hydra-Matic
225/55 R17Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4878 mm
1820 mmWidth1842 mm
1450 mmHeight1473 mm
1670 KgWeight1821 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Cima and 2014 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…