DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Cadillac CTS vs 2004 BMW 6 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW 6 Serisi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeBMW
CTSModel6 Serisi
2008Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2994 ccEngine displacement2996 cc
273 HPPower258 HP
302 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4866 mmLength4820 mm
1842 mmWidth1855 mm
1472 mmHeight1373 mm
1779 KgWeight1490 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Cadillac CTS and 2004 BMW 6 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW 6 Serisi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…