DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW 6 Serisi vs 2008 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW 6 Serisi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeCadillac
6 SerisiModelCTS
2004Model year2008
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2996 ccEngine displacement2994 cc
258 HPPower273 HP
300 NmTorque302 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,0 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4820 mmLength4866 mm
1855 mmWidth1842 mm
1373 mmHeight1472 mm
1490 KgWeight1779 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW 6 Serisi and 2008 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW 6 Serisi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…