DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac CTS vs 2005 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeSaab
CTSModel9-3
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
226 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
215 HPPower230 HP
262 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank62 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4654 mm
1795 mmWidth1782 mm
1441 mmHeight1507 mm
1705 KgWeight1570 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac CTS and 2005 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…