DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2004 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCadillac
GTOModelCTS
2004Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
220 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
225 HPPower215 HP
275 NmTorque262 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17 VTyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4828 mm
1840 mmWidth1795 mm
1285 mmHeight1441 mm
1640 KgWeight1705 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi GTO and 2004 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…