DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2002 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeToyota
CTSModelMark II
2003Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
215 HPPower200 HP
262 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
17 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4735 mm
1795 mmWidth1760 mm
1441 mmHeight1460 mm
1705 KgWeight1460 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2002 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…