DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Mark II vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCadillac
Mark IIModelCTS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
210 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
220 HPPower215 HP
296 NmTorque262 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
15 ltUrban consumption17 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4828 mm
1760 mmWidth1795 mm
1460 mmHeight1441 mm
1550 KgWeight1705 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Mark II and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…