DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2002 Nissan Laurel Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Laurel

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeNissan
CTSModelLaurel
2003Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
215 HPPower200 HP
262 NmTorque255 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
17 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4765 mm
1795 mmWidth1730 mm
1441 mmHeight1400 mm
1705 KgWeight1520 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2002 Nissan Laurel approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…