DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2002 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeNissan
CTSModelCedric
2003Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
215 HPPower210 HP
262 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank80 lt
17 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4860 mm
1795 mmWidth1770 mm
1441 mmHeight1450 mm
1705 KgWeight1600 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2002 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…