DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMercury
CTSModelSable
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
215 HPPower203 HP
262 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
17 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength5070 mm
1795 mmWidth1850 mm
1441 mmHeight1410 mm
1705 KgWeight1545 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…