DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2026 Volvo XC40 vs 2025 Mazda CX-30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.04 points.

77.93–77.97
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMazda
XC40ModelCX-30
2026Model year2025
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
180 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
197 HPPower186 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol & ElectricFuel typePetrol & Electric
54 ltFuel tank48 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
ATTransmissionMT
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4395 mm
1863 mmWidth2040 mm
1652 mmHeight1540 mm
1688 kgWeight1548 kg
443 ltLuggage capacity430 lt
2702 mmWheelbase2655 mm

Additional Features

Volvo XC40ISO-Fix fixing pointsAutonomous Emergency Braking (at all speeds)Electric front seats (with memory)2-stage luggage floor2x USB-C (rear)Bluetooth Connectivity18" 5 double-spoke black diamond cut wheelsBody-coloured exterior mirrors and door handles
Mazda CX-30Hill Start Assist (HLA)Blind Spot Monitoring (BSM)Electric tailgateglass ceilingWireless CarPlay/Android Auto10.25" Mazda Connect18" shiny silver alloy wheelsprivacy glass

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2026 Volvo XC40 and 2025 Mazda CX-30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.04 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…