DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2025 Mazda CX-30 vs 2026 Volvo XC40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.04 points.

77.97–77.93
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
CX-30ModelXC40
2025Model year2026
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
204 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
186 HPPower197 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol & ElectricFuel typePetrol & Electric
48 ltFuel tank54 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
MTTransmissionAT
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4425 mm
2040 mmWidth1863 mm
1540 mmHeight1652 mm
1548 kgWeight1688 kg
430 ltLuggage capacity443 lt
2655 mmWheelbase2702 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-30Hill Start Assist (HLA)Blind Spot Monitoring (BSM)Electric tailgateglass ceilingWireless CarPlay/Android Auto10.25" Mazda Connect18" shiny silver alloy wheelsprivacy glass
Volvo XC40ISO-Fix fixing pointsAutonomous Emergency Braking (at all speeds)Electric front seats (with memory)2-stage luggage floor2x USB-C (rear)Bluetooth Connectivity18" 5 double-spoke black diamond cut wheelsBody-coloured exterior mirrors and door handles

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2025 Mazda CX-30 and 2026 Volvo XC40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.04 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…