DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Cadillac ATS vs 2016 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLexus
ATSModelRX
2015Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
325 HPPower295 HP
373 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank73 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears8
225/40 R18; 255/35 R18Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4663 mmLength4890 mm
1841 mmWidth1895 mm
1392-1399 mmHeight1720 mm
1550 KgWeight1915 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase2789 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Cadillac ATS and 2016 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…