DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2015 Cadillac ATS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.75–85.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCadillac
Range RoverModelATS
2012Model year2015
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3628 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
271 HPPower325 HP
630 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size225/40 R18; 255/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4972 mmLength4663 mm
—Width1841 mm
1865 mmHeight1392-1399 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover and 2015 Cadillac ATS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…