2025 • Mazda
3
Mazda Mazda3 GS 2.5 AT FWD 2025Overall Score79.81/100
2025 Mazda 3 vs 2025 SsangYong Musso Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2025 • SsangYong
Musso
SsangYong KGM Musso Grand Platinum Plus 4WD 2025Overall Score79.62/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.19 points.
79.81–79.62
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Musso
MazdaMakeSsangYong
3ModelMusso
2025Model year2025
HatchbackBody typePickup
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Musso
8,5 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
210 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2200 cc
191 HPPower202 HP
252 NmTorque441 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Musso
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,8 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Musso
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
ATTransmissionAT
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Musso
4459 mmLength5405 mm
2028 mmWidth1950 mm
1440 mmHeight1855 mm
1399 kgWeight—
569 ltLuggage capacity—
2725 mmWheelbase3210 mm
Additional Features
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2025 Mazda 3 and 2025 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.19 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…