2025 • SsangYong
Musso
SsangYong KGM Musso Grand Platinum Plus 4WD 2025Overall Score79.62/100
2025 SsangYong Musso vs 2025 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2025 • Mazda
3
Mazda Mazda3 GS 2.5 AT FWD 2025Overall Score79.81/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.19 points.
79.62–79.81
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
SsangYong MussoSpecificationMazda 3
SsangYongMakeMazda
MussoModel3
2025Model year2025
PickupBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
SsangYong MussoSpecificationMazda 3
16,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
172 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2200 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
202 HPPower191 HP
441 NmTorque252 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
SsangYong MussoSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
10,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
SsangYong MussoSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
ATTransmissionAT
YesABSYes
Dimensions
SsangYong MussoSpecificationMazda 3
5405 mmLength4459 mm
1950 mmWidth2028 mm
1855 mmHeight1440 mm
—Weight1399 kg
—Luggage capacity569 lt
3210 mmWheelbase2725 mm
Additional Features
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2025 SsangYong Musso and 2025 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.19 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…