2025 • Mazda
CX-30
Mazda CX-30 Exclusive-Line 2.0 e-Skyactiv X 186 MT 2025Overall Score77.97/100
2025 Mazda CX-30 vs 2025 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2025 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 170 HP XLT 4x4 Manuel 2025Overall Score76.98/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-30
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.99 points.
77.97–76.98
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-30SpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
CX-30ModelRanger
2025Model year2025
SUVBody typePickup
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Mazda CX-30SpecificationFord Ranger
8,3 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
204 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
186 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque405 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-30SpecificationFord Ranger
Petrol & ElectricFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CX-30SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
MTTransmissionMT
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CX-30SpecificationFord Ranger
4395 mmLength5370 mm
2040 mmWidth1918 mm
1540 mmHeight1884 mm
1548 kgWeight2233 kg
430 ltLuggage capacity1000 lt
2655 mmWheelbase3270 mm
Additional Features
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2025 Mazda CX-30 and 2025 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.99 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…