DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 ZAZ Chance vs 2014 MG MG3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MG3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.25–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ ChanceSpecificationMG MG3
ZAZMakeMG
ChanceModelMG3
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

ZAZ ChanceSpecificationMG MG3
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
172 km/hTop speed108 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
85 HPPower106 HP
130 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ ChanceSpecificationMG MG3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ ChanceSpecificationMG MG3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/75 R14; 195/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

ZAZ ChanceSpecificationMG MG3
4237 mmLength4018 mm
1679 mmWidth1729 mm
1432 mmHeight1507 mm
1197 KgWeight1125 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 ZAZ Chance and 2014 MG MG3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MG3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…