DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 MG MG3 vs 2014 ZAZ Chance Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MG3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.5–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG MG3SpecificationZAZ Chance
MGMakeZAZ
MG3ModelChance
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG MG3SpecificationZAZ Chance
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
108 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
106 HPPower85 HP
137 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG MG3SpecificationZAZ Chance
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank48 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG MG3SpecificationZAZ Chance
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/75 R14; 195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG MG3SpecificationZAZ Chance
4018 mmLength4237 mm
1729 mmWidth1679 mm
1507 mmHeight1432 mm
1125 KgWeight1197 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 MG MG3 and 2014 ZAZ Chance approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MG3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…