E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1969 ZAZ 965 vs 1974 Audi 50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 965

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 965SpecificationAudi 50
ZAZMakeAudi
965Model50
1969Model year1974
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

ZAZ 965SpecificationAudi 50
—0–100 km/h13,5 s
90 km/hTop speed152 km/h
887 ccEngine displacement1093 cc
27 HPPower60 HP
52 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 965SpecificationAudi 50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank36 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 965SpecificationAudi 50
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
135/80 SR13Tyre size—

Dimensions

ZAZ 965SpecificationAudi 50
3330 mmLength3525 mm
1395 mmWidth1560 mm
1450 mmHeight1344 mm
650 KgWeight685 Kg
2023 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1969 ZAZ 965 and 1974 Audi 50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 965 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1974 Audi 50VSImage unavailableAudi 50 vs ZAZ 9651974 and 1969 model years

Comments are loading…