DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1974 Audi 50 vs 1969 ZAZ 965 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 965

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 50SpecificationZAZ 965
AudiMakeZAZ
50Model965
1974Model year1969
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

Audi 50SpecificationZAZ 965
13,5 s0–100 km/h—
152 km/hTop speed90 km/h
1093 ccEngine displacement887 cc
60 HPPower27 HP
83 NmTorque52 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 50SpecificationZAZ 965
PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank30 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 50SpecificationZAZ 965
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size135/80 SR13

Dimensions

Audi 50SpecificationZAZ 965
3525 mmLength3330 mm
1560 mmWidth1395 mm
1344 mmHeight1450 mm
685 KgWeight650 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2023 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1974 Audi 50 and 1969 ZAZ 965 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 965 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…