DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 ZAZ 1103 vs 2009 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1103

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1103SpecificationOpel Combo
ZAZMakeOpel
1103ModelCombo
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

ZAZ 1103SpecificationOpel Combo
12,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
160 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
72 HPPower70 HP
108 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1103SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
39 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1103SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

ZAZ 1103SpecificationOpel Combo
3980 mmLength4322 mm
1564 mmWidth1684 mm
1425 mmHeight1801 mm
790 KgWeight1325 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 ZAZ 1103 and 2009 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…