2009 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.3 CDTI (70 Hp) 2009Overall Score49.25/100
2009 Opel Combo vs 2009 ZAZ 1103 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • ZAZ
1103
ZAZ 1103 1.3 i (72 Hp) 2009Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
ZAZ 1103
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1103
OpelMakeZAZ
ComboModel1103
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1103
17,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
150 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
70 HPPower72 HP
170 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1103
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank39 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1103
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1103
4322 mmLength3980 mm
1684 mmWidth1564 mm
1801 mmHeight1425 mm
1325 KgWeight790 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2320 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Opel Combo and 2009 ZAZ 1103 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…