DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 ZAZ 1103 vs 2002 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1103

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeRenault
1103ModelKangoo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

15,6 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
154 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
63 HPPower65 HP
101 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
38 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3980 mmLength3995 mm
1564 mmWidth1663 mm
1425 mmHeight1827 mm
790 KgWeight1160 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 ZAZ 1103 and 2002 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…